On 4/22/14, 6:04 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-precis-framework-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-framework/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not my area of expertise, but ... :-)
Why isn't BCP18 an important reference?
Probably because, roughly speaking, BCP18 is to i18n as BCP61 is to
security. Plus much of BCP18 has been superseded by RFCs 3629, 4646,
5198, 6365, etc.
Peter
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
