> > Why isn't BCP18 an important reference? > > Probably because, roughly speaking, BCP18 is to i18n as BCP61 is to > security. Plus much of BCP18 has been superseded by RFCs 3629, 4646, > 5198, 6365, etc.
I like the idea of a BCP being superseded and still remaining as a BCP, that is probably not helpful even if 4646 got stabbed to death by 5646. What you are saying, I think, is essentially that RFC 2277 is not applicable to the space of "Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings in Application Protocols". So is RFC 2277 wrong, deprecated, or still applicable as written? And, in the former two cases, is anyone doing anything about it? Cheers, Adrian _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
