On 4/23/14, 5:47 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
I do expect the authors to follow up with the IANA questions,
Will do this evening.
but on the main point: I refer you to RFC 5892, section 5.1 and Appendix B: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5892#section-5.1 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5892#appendix-B As well as the IANA registry referred to in that document: http://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.0.0/idna-tables-6.0.0.xhtml#idna-tables-6.0.0-properties This is pretty much identical to what IDNA did. I agree that we should probably recruit the expert (and I hope we can recruit the same expert as the one for IDNA Derived Properties), but I don't think the task will be tremendously burdensome, even though it sounds that way. The point of "don't just copy Appendix A" is to account for the possibility that the Unicode properties might be moving targets. But for the most part, it's an act of checking that the properties are "as expected".
Yes. And we had some discussion about that on the WG list: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis/current/msg00605.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/precis/current/msg00606.html Peter _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
