On 4/24/14 9:19 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
It's good to hear that it won't be burdensome, but it still seems that the working group produced an incomplete document.
Sort of. The problem is that it really isn't the IETF's expertise or responsibility to create that sort of document. In fact what would be ideal is to point to a document or registry controlled by the Unicode Consortium. But the conclusion of the community during IDNA was that we would not be provided such a stable reference. Given that, IDNA did a de-reference; we'd create an IANA registry, run by a Unicode expert, but that tracked the state of the properties that we needed for our purposes. Not pretty or ideal, but practical. This WG followed that lead, I think equally pragmatically.
As you say, water under the bridge. I got email back and Patrik has agreed to be the expert; I'll add a management item during agenda bash. He'll prepare the contents of the registry and we should be good to go.
pr -- Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
