On 2014/08/30 04:41, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
This brings up another point: it probably makes sense to delete the codepoint table from the precis-framework specification and to create the initial registration in a better way (see discussion in other threads). It was helpful scaffolding, but probably has outlived its usefulness.
One alternative is to have two separate drafts, the actual framework and the data tables. That's what the LTRU WG used for language subtags, in two iterations. Just an idea.
Regards, Martin. _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
