On 9/1/14, 5:25 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
On 2014/08/30 04:41, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
This brings up another point: it probably makes sense to delete the
codepoint table from the precis-framework specification and to create
the initial registration in a better way (see discussion in other
threads). It was helpful scaffolding, but probably has outlived its
usefulness.
One alternative is to have two separate drafts, the actual framework and
the data tables. That's what the LTRU WG used for language subtags, in
two iterations. Just an idea.
Yes, I was thinking about moving the table to an informational draft for
purposes of traceability.
Peter
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
