On 11/24/14, 7:46 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
Having a profile that leaves case mapping decisions open and a profile that maps (in a separate spec) is definitely worse than having a profile that doesn't map and a profile that maps in the same central location. It's still two profiles, but they are both in a readily usable state.
Yes, that's how I see it.
The only caveat may be "but what variant of case mapping exactly"? If the WG has discussed this already, then we should be fine.
The PRECIS framework document says: If case mapping is desired (instead of case preservation), it is RECOMMENDED to use Unicode Default Case Folding as defined in Chapter 3 of the Unicode Standard [Unicode7.0]. So I would follow that recommendation here. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://andyet.com/ _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
