--On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 13:44 -0600 Pete Resnick
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, so perhaps reversing it, and being more specific, would be
> better:
>
> Even so, implementations that are sensitive to the advice
> given in
> this specification (to use the more restrictive
> IdentifierClass
> whenever possible, or otherwise to only allow a restricted
> set of
> characters in the FreeformClass, particularly avoiding
> ones whose
> implications they don't actually understand) are unlikely
> to run
> into significant problems as a consequence of these issues
> or
> potential changes.
>
>
> Is that clearer for everyone?
For me, at least, much clearer and better.
So this works for me.
john
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
