* Pete Resnick wrote: >Ah, so perhaps reversing it, and being more specific, would be better: > > Even so, implementations that are sensitive to the advice given in > this specification (to use the more restrictive IdentifierClass > whenever possible, or otherwise to only allow a restricted set of > characters in the FreeformClass, particularly avoiding ones whose > implications they don't actually understand) are unlikely to run > into significant problems as a consequence of these issues or > potential changes. > >Is that clearer for everyone?
Yes, thank you. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[email protected] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
