On 2/9/15 1:42 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:

This might turn out that I'm convinced there is nothing better to say
than "use 5893".

That's where we ended up the last time we looked into the problem.

That will cause me to weep into my beer.

Sorry.

But give me a
bit to chat with Klensin and we'll see if we can come up with sanity.

I agree that the Bidi Rule from RFC 5893 is designed for use with DNS labels, and that it's not a perfect fit for PRECIS strings. But it might be the best we can do right now.

Peter


_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

Reply via email to