Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-precis-mappings-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-mappings/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - The write-up didn't tell me if this is likely to be considered as neutral by the Unicode folks, or as something non-neutral. I'm curious about that, but not concerned much. I do think the IESG should be aware though if this is something that might cause e.g. liaison fun for the IAB later on. (I'm not saying I think it does/would btw, just that I'd like to know if it might.) - The secdir review [1] raised an issue and some changes were proposed for a -12 version that hasn't yet popped out (which is fine). This is just to note that to decrease the probability we forget:-) [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05900.html _______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
