On 9/2/15 5:06 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hiya,
On 03/09/15 00:02, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
- The write-up didn't tell me if this is likely to be
considered as neutral by the Unicode folks, or as
something non-neutral. I'm curious about that, but not
concerned much. I do think the IESG should be aware
though if this is something that might cause e.g.
liaison fun for the IAB later on. (I'm not saying I
think it does/would btw, just that I'd like to know if
it might.)
What do you mean by "neutral"?
So I was being too oblique eh:-) Not something I'm good at
I guess.
I'm wondering if this contains anything about which they'd
go ballistic.
I'm just a lowly shepherd, but I don't think so...
_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
