Am 05.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb Sam Whited:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This sounds useful. Submitting it as an individual Internet-Draft
>> (draft-whited-precis-test-vectors-00) is the best first step. That enables
>> the working group to determine if the document is suitable for adoption as a
>> working group item. I'd be happy to help you in your work on this document.
> 
> Thanks Peter,
> 
> I've started outlining a draft here:
> http://samwhited.bitbucket.org/rfcs/draft-whited-precis-token.nroff
> 

I presume you meant to link
<http://samwhited.bitbucket.org/rfcs/draft-whited-precis-test-vectors-00.nroff>
or
<http://samwhited.bitbucket.org/rfcs/draft-whited-precis-test-vectors-00.txt>.

As an aside, I personally think programming language identifiers are
sufficiently covered by UAX # 31 <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/>.
I'd expect any I-D in this direction to reference it and/or discuss it's
deficiencies.

Regards,
Florian Zeitz

_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

Reply via email to