On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Florian Zeitz <[email protected]> wrote:
> I presume you meant to link
> <http://samwhited.bitbucket.org/rfcs/draft-whited-precis-test-vectors-00.nroff>
> or
> <http://samwhited.bitbucket.org/rfcs/draft-whited-precis-test-vectors-00.txt>.

Oops, sorry about that, you're correct, of course.

> As an aside, I personally think programming language identifiers are
> sufficiently covered by UAX # 31 <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr31/>.
> I'd expect any I-D in this direction to reference it and/or discuss it's
> deficiencies.

Thanks, I hadn't read that report. I'm not sure that particular draft
is something I'm going to continue with anyways; it was intended to be
an improvement on the current situation in Go (and hopefully useful by
other languages). If I ever pick it back up I'll make sure to take
that report into account. </offtopic>

Best,
Sam



-- 
Sam Whited
pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3
https://blog.samwhited.com

_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

Reply via email to