On 7/5/17 2:17 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-7564bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> A table comparing Identifier and Freeform code point rules would not go 
> unappreciated

Were you thinking of something like the following?

      +===========================+=================+===============+
      |        CATEGORY           | IDENTIFIERCLASS | FREEFORMCLASS |
      +===========================+=================+===============+
      | LetterDigits              | Valid           | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Unstable                  |          [N/A (unused)]         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | IgnorableProperties       |          [N/A (unused)]         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | IgnorableBlocks           |          [N/A (unused)]         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | LDH                       |          [N/A (unused)]         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Exceptions                | Contextual      | Contextual    |
      |                           | Rule Required   | Rule Required |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | BackwardCompatible        |      [Handled by IDNA Rules]    |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | JoinControl               | Contextual      | Contextual    |
      |                           | Rule Required   | Required      |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | OldHangulJamo             | Disallowed      | Disallowed    |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Unassigned                | Unassigned      | Unassigned    |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | ASCII7                    | Valid           | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Controls                  | Disallowed      | Disallowed    |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | PrecisIgnorableProperties | Disallowed      | Disallowed    |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Spaces                    | Disallowed      | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Symbols                   | Disallowed      | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | Punctuation               | Disallowed      | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | HasCompat                 | Disallowed      | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+
      | OtherLetterDigits         | Disallowed      | Valid         |
      +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+

              Table 1: Comparative Disposition of Code Points

/psa

_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis

Reply via email to