Yes, something like that.... -Ekr
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/5/17 2:17 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria. > html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-precis-7564bis/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > A table comparing Identifier and Freeform code point rules would not go > unappreciated > > Were you thinking of something like the following? > > +===========================+=================+===============+ > | CATEGORY | IDENTIFIERCLASS | FREEFORMCLASS | > +===========================+=================+===============+ > | LetterDigits | Valid | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Unstable | [N/A (unused)] | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | IgnorableProperties | [N/A (unused)] | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | IgnorableBlocks | [N/A (unused)] | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | LDH | [N/A (unused)] | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Exceptions | Contextual | Contextual | > | | Rule Required | Rule Required | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | BackwardCompatible | [Handled by IDNA Rules] | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | JoinControl | Contextual | Contextual | > | | Rule Required | Required | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | OldHangulJamo | Disallowed | Disallowed | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Unassigned | Unassigned | Unassigned | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | ASCII7 | Valid | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Controls | Disallowed | Disallowed | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | PrecisIgnorableProperties | Disallowed | Disallowed | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Spaces | Disallowed | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Symbols | Disallowed | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | Punctuation | Disallowed | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | HasCompat | Disallowed | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > | OtherLetterDigits | Disallowed | Valid | > +---------------------------+-----------------+---------------+ > > Table 1: Comparative Disposition of Code Points > > /psa > >
_______________________________________________ precis mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
