Apologies for previous truncated message due to finger trouble on my part!

On Friday 11 August 2006 22:40, roger lindley wrote:
> I attempted a posting at 9:50 PM CDT last night (August 10th)
> which included the FORTRAN source code of the implementation
> of the algorithm among other things.  The posting did not
> appear.  I don't know why unless the postings are limited in
> size.

Doesn't look big enough to be a problem ... ?
>
> Anyway I am attempting another posting herewith.  The
> following link is to the text of the failed posting.  So if
> this gets posted, then you can read what I attempted to
> post by following the link.
>
> Link to failed posting: http://westondigital.com/prime/failedposting.txt

Thanks. The algorithm is basically the same as that I posted on 8th August 
though the extension to get powers is an improvement on that I proposed on 
the 10th.

My "pointer list" idea conserves memory.

Roger's method of detecting powers of factors is cleverer and a bit more 
efficient than my crude idea.

I doubt very much whether either of us have done anything more original than 
re-inventing the wheel. Having said that, with regard to Roger's original 
question, no, I can't point at a direct statement of Roger's algorithm, 
though that is very far from proving that a prior claim doesn't exist.

Regards
Brian Beesley
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime

Reply via email to