John R Pierce wrote:
>>Even if such a program existed, the information you give is
>>insufficient. What operating system, for example?
>>
>>
>
>
> .exe pretty much says Windows.
Erm, not so. First, "Windows" is not *a* thing. 95 is not 98 is
not ME is not XP is not 2000. Second, I use three (count 'em) three
operating systems which use the ".exe" extension for executables
and which will not run a "Windows" executable (any flavor).
A stated desire for "a program which is ready to run" is a vague
wish, not a list of requirements suitable for someone trying to
satisfy someone else' needs.
Could you develop such a program given such vague requirements?
I could not, and I've been doing it since 1980 or so.
OS, input/output format requirements, memory usage, CPU, all these
enter into the mix, and not one was specified.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
_______________________________________________
Prime mailing list
[email protected]
http://hogranch.com/mailman/listinfo/prime
