Meta does seem like a parser for people allergic to parsing. Of course it has a great lisp pedigree as well. I am biased by early exposure to Ken Thompson's work on regular expressions and LALR parsers.
Matt On 02/04/2011 09:31 AM, Thomas M. Hermann wrote: > I am absolutely biased towards meta-sexp: > > "A META parser generator using LL(1) grammars with s-expressions." > > https://github.com/vy/meta-sexp > > It seems dirt simple to use, at least to me and the performance has > been acceptable. > > Regards, > > ~ Tom > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Thomas M. Hermann > Odonata Research LLC > http://www.odonata-research.com/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasmhermann > > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 4 February 2011 16:39, Paul Tarvydas <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > The relatively new PEG packrat parser technologies make it possible > > to use just one universal description for, both, scanning and > > parsing. I see that cl-peg exists, but I haven't tried it out. > > Esrap is another packrat parser for CL: > > https://github.com/nikodemus/esrap > > I had to parse some semi-structured text and wrote Esrap for that. Its > primary limitations are lacking support for parsing from streams (it > wants a string) and very little documentation. > > Cheers, > > -- Nikodemus > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro > > > > _______________________________________________ > pro mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
_______________________________________________ pro mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
