In fact I should have consolidated my replies, but by the time I realized I was probably spamming the list, I was too far in. I used to get impression that writing parsers in lisp was like moon-shining: lots of people had rough and ready parsers out in the back woods, but didn't really like talking about them.
I am grateful, and a little overwhelmed by all the responses here. Thank you, Matt On 02/04/2011 02:59 PM, Daniel Weinreb wrote: > So the next time anyone says that there aren't any > libraries for Common Lisp, we can reply that > there are so many good parser libraries that > one must compare notes to figure out which is > best for which situation. _______________________________________________ pro mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
