Hi all,
I don't know how naive this will sound, but for this matter, wouldn't it be
possible to get the help of a world-famous blind singer?  You know who I'm
talking about don't you.
Regards,
Jean-Philippe Rykiel
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Halatyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussions on the use of VoiceOver in professional audioenvironments"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: disscussions of proffessional audio in the recording studio


> Hey Tracy,
>
> Well, for now, the only accessible version of Pro Tools is version 5.1 to
> 5.3 with OS 9. while it's a useable scenario, it's becoming more and more
> dated. Within a few years, it'll be fairly obsolete. I mean, one would be
> able to use it in a self-contained studio environment but, as time goes
> on,
> compatibility will become more and more of an issue.
>
> Jerry
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tracy Son" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "pro audio list" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:41 PM
> Subject: disscussions of proffessional audio in the recording studio
>
>
>> Hello Jerry.
>> Thank you for the reply and I will be looking forward to signing such a
>> potition if one is drawn up.
>> It is kind of sad that a member of the development team won't even look
>> at
>> the possibility and writes it off as difficult.
>> This is how so many companys view disscussion of accessability and it
>> seems
>> so many times that at first we run into a brick wall before even having a
>> chance to break through and get things done.
>> a reply of this kind from a development team is just an easy excuse of
>> getting out of having to deal with a sertain secter of the public.
>> For a while, this proffession of getting into recording ingineering or
>> possibly operating a recording studio gave some of us a glimmer of hope
>> but
>> with the revamping of the os system in the mack and digidesigns unwilling
>> atitude to work with apple to make there program accessable puts a damper
>> on
>> things.
>> I know that in the Nashville Tennessee area, most of the recording
>> studios
>> here use the protools software.
>> I think there is a training school here for recording techs or ingineers
>> but
>> that would pritty much lock me out of taking any training or going to
>> such
>> a
>> school if they use protools.
>> I know this is a mac list so I won't bring up protools for windows except
>> to
>> say that even with the windows screen readers, getting around the screen
>> with the mouse cursoring keys of either screen reader is difficult at
>> best
>> because a lot of the buttons in protools for xp are not labled and some
>> of
>> the buttons are non detectible with the mouse cursoring keys of either
>> windows screen reader.
>> Are there any other options out there for recording software of high
>> quality
>> for the mac that is used in recording studios?
>> Good luck and I think it would be a good idea to get a potition up and
>> send
>> it to Digidesign with a whole lot of names.
>> Tracy Son.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ProAudio mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://macvisionaries.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio_macvisionaries.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ProAudio mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://macvisionaries.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio_macvisionaries.com
>
>





_______________________________________________
ProAudio mailing list
[email protected]
http://macvisionaries.com/mailman/listinfo/proaudio_macvisionaries.com

Reply via email to