Actually, they need to be modem routers rather than just plain routers, otherwise they will not be able to interpret the digital ADSL signal. They are certainly preferable to the USB modems that BT and the other ISPs tend to offer. The main reason for this is that they do not require any driver software, and the fact that if you have one with, say 4 ports, you can offer simultaneous Internet access to a number of computers on your local area network (LAN).

Unlike USB modems, you do not have to "dial in" to make a connection: they remain on the whole time. (I've had mine on almost non-stop for over three years).

Installation is usually very simple by means of a built-in web interface so that the settings can be adjusted using a browser like Explorer or Navigator. The Thomson (Alcatel) SpeedTouch 510v4 (successor to the 510) is particularly easy to set up and includes the benefit of a built-in firewall. A full review is shown at http://www.adslguide.org.uk/hardware/reviews/2002/q4/st510v4.asp

Most of the router manufacturers are also now offering models with "wireless" access too, so that the usual clutter of ethernet cables can be reduced: ideal if you wish to access your e-mail using your laptop anywhere around the studio or house - or even in the garden!

Clive



To those of you lucky enough to get ADSL in your area, I would strongly
recommend getting a router rather than a modem. I got one called an Alcatel
Speedtouch 510.  I didn't install it, so I don't know what's involved, but
it's been up non-stop without a single problem for 4 months, and isn't
bothered by switching from OS9 to OSX.
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE


Reply via email to