Hi List,
I don't know if anyone else picked up on the editors comment in
professional photography magazine the other month, but it was food for
though.
Steve Hynes considered the possibility that rather than chips becoming
bigger to cover existing SLR bodies and lenses, maybe they could reduce
the size by making the pixels smaller, thereby creating a high res
small chip, the benefits of which would be smaller camera bodies and
smaller wider aperture high resolution lenses.
I think its time someone made a mini fuji 680... the Digiflex2 is a
good start, but, at the moment I think that the tail is wagging the
dog.
What thinks the list?
Have a good weekend
P
�-��
�
~ �
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
- Re: [PRODIG] Re: Slow Mac mouse etc. / The... Richard Kenward
- Re: [PRODIG] Re: Slow Mac mouse etc. /... Paul Bradforth
- Re: [PRODIG] Re: Slow Mac mouse etc. / The... matthew ward
- [PRODIG] Re: Iview 1.5.6 and Fuji S2 RAF files Karl Dankbars
- [PRODIG] Re: Iview 1.5.6 and Fuji S2 RAF files Mike Russell
- [PRODIG] OT music speakers Steve Climpson
- Re: [PRODIG] OT music speakers Thomas Holm / Pixl
- Re: [PRODIG] OT music speakers John Callan
- Re: [PRODIG] OT music speakers Mike Russell
- Re: [PRODIG] OT music speakers Paul Fawley
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips? Paul Fawley
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips? Michael Wilkinson
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips? william.curwen
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips? John Hill
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips? Ian Goodrick
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips / bigge... Neil Barstow
- Re: [PRODIG]Smaller chips? Jack Lowe
- [PRODIG] Re: Monitor Profiles Glyn Davies
- Re: [PRODIG] Re: Monitor Profiles Andrew Woods
- RE: [PRODIG] Re: Monitor Profiles Nij
- Re: [PRODIG] Re: Monitor Profiles Thomas Holm / Pixl
