On 13/12/02 10:53, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > One issue with the hard drive solution to back-up. When I was buying a > particular camera, someone advised me that the best way to keep it reliable > was to use it every day. The argument was that precision (electro-)mechanical > devices can seize up if not used for a time. And it seems to be true; I > carefully wrapped up and stored two previously reliable cameras in good > condition, but on opening a couple of years later neither were working. > > Is there anything in the design of hard drives which might keep them > functioning if not used for a while? Are the MTBF figures based on continuous > usage?
Paul As I mentioned in my post, There is no real point having a permanent off site archive. The archive is in fact in the back-up system. The off-site hard drive is rotated on a frequent basis (lets say every week or two) with the main back-up drive, therefore the drives are in fairly continuous use. If one drive does develop a problem, chances are it will be quickly picked up, as the back-up will fail. At which point it can easily be replaced. I would certainly not recommend long term storage (without use) using a hard drive. Although I have no data regarding its possible seizure. Paul -- Paul Tansley Fashion & Beauty Photography London +44 (0) 7973 669584 http://www.paultansley.com =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
