> I have been waiting for the Kodak DCS pro 14n to arrive, but since its delay > I've been wondering if the Canon is a better bet. There does not seem to be > any in-depth reviews of the 14n to be found on the web that feature > photographers who have actually used it out.
Apart from the delay to deliver the Kodak body, remember the basic difference between the two bodies is that the Canon offers a burst rate of 3 files per burst,shooting at 3 fps, before the camera stops and record data to the flashcard, while Kodak only offers - in theory- 1,5 files per burst, this only means that you have to shoot in Kodak like one frame at a time, almost like using a film camera with no motordrive, and even though the Canon rate is low, it is still more acceptable to some type of works. Depends on what do you want the camera for. All the best. Jorge Parra =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
