> For RGB=>RGB conversions, I believe the general consensus will be Adobe's
> CM engine and perceptual intent ... but, what you do not mention, and to be
> accurate with regard to intent, whomever here is familiar with "Apple 1998"
> ('less you mean "Adobe 1998") would need take the "from" color space into
> account(?)

OK,

I use apple RGB colour space for most images not "adobe 1998" sorry. Dunno
how that slipped out....

The scans are in "nikon apple rgb 4.0.0.3000" colour space.

I have "Adobe ACE", Apple CMM, Heidleberg CMM and apple Coloursync engines
available to me in PS. Anyone have an idea which is preferred and why?

Andy

-- 
Andy Johnstone Photography
Member of the Association of Photographers (UK)



===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to