> My 8k film recorder needs a file sized 67mb to make a 6x8cm tranny without
> interpolation
> Even at this resolution I can tell the dupe from the original If side by side
> on a light
> box !
> if viewed independently one simply can not tell but direct comparison by a
> "trained " eye
> will see the difference.
Indeed, you would be blind if you don�t notice the extra grain of the
original.... A dupe of a slide is by far obviously worst
For all matters, for a 35 mm slide ,scanned at 400dpi at standard 24x36 mm
native size, just run the info in Photoshop and it will tell you that you
only need a 62 Mb file.
This is by far one of best way to test interpolations, going back to film,
but that will mean you have to go back to a scanner to go back to digital
and I wonder who is soo stubborn as to deny the advantages of digital
capture in the first place as to decide to jump into this workflow.
Perhaps someone owning a film recorder may enjoy the back-up workflow that
results from keeping your vey best files as slide dupes as an archive /
library, and with a good assistant it is a fine way to kill downtime, but it
is expensive and I don't know if extra digital back up would do about the
same job,specially if you are not going to deliver those slides over to
clients. Otherwise, You would be forcing your clients to scan your slide and
that may be totally out of your control, second generation material.
Saludos.
Jorge Parra Photography
International Member
APA / EP / ASMP
Fashion, Beauty and Lifestyle Photography
http://www.jorgeparra.com
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
