> I visited AGE Fotostock the other day and their policy regarding file > size and digital capture seems to be the most sensible that I have > come across. You can get to it from the photographers > submission > link. Here's the home link http://www.agefotostock.com/
Shangara and Fellow Listreaders: Your visit to AGE Fotostock brings up an important and rarely mentioned point - the relationship between what an agency demands and what it can earn. For those who simply don't care about revenue, it's easy to find agencies that will take almost anything. But there are a small group of stock agencies that can actually earn substantial revenues for the images you place with them. It is this small group that makes both the biggest demands and offers the highest in returns. Simon's posts are about pleasing an agency that's unique in its ability to get high prices and important placements. The top agencies define themselves in many ways, but they way they generate the kind of money they do is by pleasing clients that smaller and lower priced agencies can't satisfy. If you want to be working with them, it's your job to create images that meet thier standards. If you flaunt their rules, they will have no problem finding others who don't. Brian Yarvin Food Photography, Writing, and Recipes http://www.brianyarvin.com http://www.farmsandfoods.com =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
