Thanks for your reply Martin! It's very good to get such a detailed answer from an official source. Thumbs up for Kodak on that issue at least.
Since my last mail I have shot hundreds of images with the camera. Used it yesterday at my daughters birthday, lots of kids running around and I was impressed on how fast I was able to work with it, write time is good with a fast CF card and that 512MB buffer is great. Flash exposure is very good! I have used flash manually 90% of the time with my D1x because it's so inconsistent. On the whole I aim for exposure that extends into the ERI range and the files are good. It takes a bit of time getting used to this workflow, overexpose on the D1x and you are screwed. This reminds me of the way I used to work with Neg shooting, esp. to get sharper and snappier image. I have been using Photoshop CS Camera RAW to develop the images, since it's considerably faster than PhotoDesk. I have yet to test the RAW conversion side by side, esp. on high ISO noise removal, I suspect PhotoDesk should do better on that. Will there be any "batch" capabilities in the future in PhotoDesk, mabey similar to CaptureOne? The CaptureOne workflow is so fast, when I got it for my D1x it really changed a lot for me. Fix that magenta hue shift and I am probably ordering one. Best Chris =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
