Stuart,
Considering the manger's complete lack of tactical knowledge I think we did
much better than we could have hoped for. 

Really, to go into a World cup with 2 strikers inured, one who has NEVER
played a competitive premiership match (why did he bother taking him?) and
one other who is a mediocre (but TALL) target man who should be playing in
the Championship if he isn't given any service from other players really
shows how far out of touch Sven was. 

And who have we replaced him with? The very same person who has actively
supported all these stupid decisions! Amazing.

Bring back Venables. I really don't care what he got up to in his private
life, at least we played attractive football with him in charge.

Meanwhile the "Swede" walks away with £4m a year - so maybe heisn't THAT
stupid after all.

Dave Crozier

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Stuart Hurley
Sent: 02 July 2006 11:10
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [WC] A horrible way to end the Beautiful Game

> On Jul 1, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Helio W. wrote:
> 
> > Portugal won!
> >
> > Yet another game that went all the way to
> penalties!
> 
>       For the first time in the WC, I thought that
> England actually  
> outplayed their opponent. They had several scoring
> chances in the  
> second half, despite being a man down. To be
> eliminated by kicks is  
> just stupid, just as it was yesterday, when
> Argentina outplayed  
> Germany, but was also eliminated.
> 

Wow, as a partisan supporter that ten minutes of
penalties must have of taken a few weeks of the end of
my life. Didn't think my nerves could take it.

England did outplay Portugal. I think it was Sven's
tactics, or the lack them, that cost us the victory.
The lack of support for Rooney during the first half
meant he was wasted player.

France v Brazil - when will I guess the outcome of a
game in this World Cup. Not the score, just the winner
would be start.

Stuart

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to