Is this the new Radical Religious Righters spin? LOL All of my life, I have been taught the virtue of having government separate form religion. For example, this allows each American the freedom to worship a God of his/her own understanding, eliminate the threat of religious secretarian violence , civil war, and discrimination, provides equal justice under the law, regardless of religious beliefs, etc. Separation of church and state is the very foundation of our freedom, liberties, and right to due process guaranteed under the constitution. If there were no separation of church and state, there would be no Democracy or freedom in America.

Regards,

LelandJ

Michael Madigan wrote:

There is no "separation of church and state" only that
there cannot be an official state religion

--- Leland Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Radical Religious Righters such as Republican Harris
Condemns, if elected to congress in numbers, would do much more than amend the Constitution; they would replace the Constitution with the 10 commandment. Anyone for a Theocratic Taliban like
government?

If this kind of extremism became grass roots picking
up momentum, it would be very fertile ground for Neo-conservative in the DOD, Pentagon, and CIA who know how to tap into grass roots movement, through deceit and manipulation, to increase their own power.
#-----------------------------------------


 Rep. Harris Condemns Separation of Church, State

By Jim Stratton
Orlando Sentinel
Saturday, August 26, 2006; Page A09

ORLANDO, Aug. 25 -- Rep. Katherine Harris (R-Fla.)
said this week that God did not intend for the United States to be a "nation of secular laws" and that the separation of church and state is a "lie we have been told" to keep religious people out of politics.

"If you're not electing Christians, then in essence
you are going to legislate sin," Harris told interviewers from the Florida Baptist Witness, the weekly journal of the Florida Baptist State Convention. She cited abortion and same-sex marriage as examples of
that sin.

Harris, a candidate in the Sept. 5 Republican
primary for U.S. Senate, said her religious beliefs "animate" everything she does, including her votes in Congress.

Witness editors interviewed candidates for office,
asking them to describe their faith and their positions on certain
issues.

Harris has always professed a deep Christian faith.
But she has rarely expressed such a fervent evangelical perspective
publicly.

Political and religious officials responded to her
published remarks with outrage and dismay.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) said she was
"disgusted" by the comments "and deeply disappointed in Representative
Harris personally."

Harris, Wasserman Schultz said, "clearly shows that
she does not deserve to be a representative."

Ruby Brooks, a veteran Tampa Bay Republican
activist, said Harris's remarks "were offensive to me as a Christian and a
Republican."

"This notion that you've been chosen or anointed,
it's offensive," Brooks said. "We hurt our cause with that more than
we help it."

Harris told the journalists "we have to have the
faithful in government" because that is God's will. Separating religion and politics is "so wrong because God is the one who chooses our
rulers," she said.

"And if we are the ones not actively involved in
electing those godly men and women," then "we're going to have a nation of secular laws. That's not what our Founding Fathers intended, and that certainly isn't what God intended."

Harris campaign spokeswoman Jennifer Marks would not
answer questions about the Harris interview. Instead, she released a
two-sentence statement.

"Congresswoman Harris encourages Americans from all
walks of life and faith to participate in our government," it stated. "She continues to be an unwavering advocate of religious rights and
freedoms."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/25/AR2006082501640.html?referrer=email
or

http://tinyurl.com/okbtn

#-------------------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance:
http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
are the opinions of the author, and do not
constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
too stupid to see the obvious.




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to