> > Spam, for example, should have been stepped up to with a national > > no-spam registry, like the one used for telemarketing > (which works for > > me) > > This sort of thinking is fruitless. Laws from one > nation have no effect on other nations. Most spam isn't sent from the spammers > themselves, anyway - most comes from infected zombie Windows machines.
I'm not disagreeing - just saying that if nothing is done, the heavy-handed folks will lay their case down and people wouldn't be able to argue it. Today we deal with hundreds of spams, but if nothing is done about it, that number could grow exponentially, and then we'll be so hungry for a solution that we'll accept anything. We've got to come up with specific solutions for specific problems before it gets to the point where only total control will work. Bill > -- Ed Leafe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
