On Monday 09 October 2006 23:30, Michael Madigan wrote:

Hi Michael!

Is there a basic standard of living? Things that no American can be without? 
Will you allow that a person has to have a house to live in, or should he/she 
have to live with multiple roomates so the wages can be less? Is a telephone 
a necessity if a person wishes to work or should you let the phone be cut off 
after you land the job, never mind that all jobs are temporary? Are clothes 
optional or maybe the person should have to wear his/her work uniform 24/7?

Sarasota has been talking about affordable housing for years, but it just 
doesn't happen except when subsidized by the government (the projects) or the 
church (habitat for humanity)

I can understand the drugs, alcohol and gambling being problems, but these 
problems do not explain no housing under $1500 a month while wages are $1200 
and you might have to work three jobs to get that. Either the "affordable" 
housing has to be there (and the rich people won't budge on it) or the wages 
have to increase (and the rich people control these as well).

"Most" is a sweeping generalization. It may apply to a few cases, but the 
drug, alcohol and gambling around here, for example, is as much a problem 
amongst the rich as the poor.

Regards,

Pete


> A person in poverty today has cable tv, telephone,
> cellphone, car, clothes, etc.
>
> A person in American poverty is not the same as a
> person in North Korean poverty, or a person living in
> poverty in Beverly Hills.
>
> Most poverty is self-inflicted.  Drug, alcohol or
> gambling addictions, having children they can't
> afford, buying items they don't need.
>
> That's not to say real poverty doesn't exist, but it
> isn't as much as we'd like to believe.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to