Michael Madigan wrote:
> They're all the same.  Although Chu is an physicist, most of these twits are 
> journalism or English majors.  Most of them wouldn't understand the 
> scientific method or statistical analysis if their life depended on it.   Of 
> course Chu is a physicist, but he isn't a businessman.   His degrees are from 
> two Liberal sewers, Rochester and Berkeley. 
> 
> Many of the incandescent factories were in the USA where as most CF factories 
> are overseas.   I think it's wonderful to put people out of work to fix the 
> Hoax of Global Warming.   These people should all be put in jail for fraud.  

Hi Michael,

I don't think they are the same at all. I think the incandescent bulbs 
cost less and last longer than the curlys. Enough that the reduced 
electric consumption doesn't offset them.

> Forget the CO2 - my concern was that Chu said "we are taking away a choice
> that continues to let people waste their own money".  Who made these people
> God?

> Most lights are turned on at night when there is an abundance of power, so
> most CF bulbs don't save an ounce of CO2.  

>> Earlier today I posted that I did not understand the purpose of the
>> departments of Education or Energy. 

>> En-light- enment came a little while ago on page 2 of the weekend WSJ. 
> All about the banishment of incandescent bulbs.  Our energy Secretary Stephen
>> Chu said  "We are taking away a choice that continues to let people waste
>> their own money."

>> Ok sport, I have used the curly fluorescent bulbs for years  and they work
>> very well.  Hell,  Duke Energy gives them away.  But, at my desk I need
> real light and run 4 - 100 watt clear bulbs.  I like light and prefer them. 
> Who TF is Chu to tell me what I like or not?

>> Now that I think about it, what happened to those 500w halogen bulbs?

>> Anyway, WSJ thanks for informing me about MY need for the Department of
>> Energy.

> As an early adopter of the curlys I find that they cost a lot and do not 
> last as long as incandescent bulbs. How do you say "Lying crooks?"
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to