Ok, but I guess we really don't want to be dependent on YouTube in the long run for this part of our operation, just in case something happens there, like they might decide to start charging for the service?
James E Harvey Corresponding Officer/M.I.S. Hanover Shoe Farms, Inc. www.hanoverpa.com [email protected] 717-637-8931 fax: 717-637-6766 cell: 717-887-2565 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 9:02 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [NF] "Best" file format for video playback on web site On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:19 AM, James E Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > We do have a YouTube account for some of our farm videos, but the > yearling videos number in the 100's + and counting, and it seems a > better user experience to use the web site to promote the product. -------------- I am saying that you embed the youtube video into your page design, not send people to youtube to view it. -- Stephen Russell Unified Health Services 60 Germantown Court Suite 220 Cordova, TN 38018 Telephone: 888.510.2667 901.246-0159 cell [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
