Stephen the Cook wrote:
Alan Bourke <> wrote:
If an open-source Visual FoxPro that wasn't called "Visual FoxPro"
appeared tomorrow it would be hailed as the best thing ever. The name
just has so much baggage now irregardless of the advantages of using
it.
Not sure. It would have to do more out of the install, then just desktop
apps. To gain any appeal it would need to have Web components also to gain
any notice. To not have them would be guarantee the ignore factor it would
receive.
Steve's right, and that's so evident in our recent posts where we all
know that there's this "gotta be a web app" craze that continues to be
the battle-cry from PHB management. <g>
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
"Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!"
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
