No problems with it here...but HTML can be something of a moving target. FWIW, I've tried 5 or 6 different email sending solutions for VFP apps and BLAT has been the hands-down best, most reliable and least difficult to implement.
Mike Copeland MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > On 8/22/2011 2:16 PM, Paul McNett wrote: >> BLAT has nothing to do with formatting of emails. All it speaks is SMTP. All >> an email >> is is a properly formatted series of bytes. So format those bytes to make an >> HTML >> email, and BLAT will send it. > What's the success rate of having your HTML email show consistently and > correctly in various popular email clients? Seems like long ago, that > was the issue. Not sure if it still is anymore. > > I love the BLAT approach, though. Nice and lightweight. Simple. > > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
