I totally agree (Blatting), until the ISP stops it In this country, one of the largest ISP's is called Xtra
If you have an account with them and your email is jonnie@xtra, blatting is no problem If you have an account with them and a domain name so your email is [email protected], they will block the emails you have blatted. In this scenario I set up a gmail account for my client and CDO the emails S On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Mike Copeland <[email protected]> wrote: > No problems with it here...but HTML can be something of a moving target. > > FWIW, I've tried 5 or 6 different email sending solutions for VFP apps > and BLAT has been the hands-down best, most reliable and least difficult > to implement. > > Mike Copeland > > MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: >> On 8/22/2011 2:16 PM, Paul McNett wrote: >>> BLAT has nothing to do with formatting of emails. All it speaks is SMTP. >>> All an email >>> is is a properly formatted series of bytes. So format those bytes to make >>> an HTML >>> email, and BLAT will send it. >> What's the success rate of having your HTML email show consistently and >> correctly in various popular email clients? Seems like long ago, that >> was the issue. Not sure if it still is anymore. >> >> I love the BLAT approach, though. Nice and lightweight. Simple. >> >> > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAG1nNy9E_G954_T2bMcsb4TOG8oYnt6wRbR2QYLkJQ=wwe=0...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
