On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> His peers from the university he works at adjudged him not guilty in 3 of 4
>> areas. Yup, I've been put at ease.
>
> In science you are always judged by your peers.
That's what makes it a conspiracy! ;-)
For the record, I didn't post this to sway the deniers; I'm convinced
that they will cling to anything, real or imaginary, rather than open their
minds. They start with their opinion, and then pick and choose those things
that support that opinion, and twist or ignore those that don't.
My only purpose in posting that is for the people who actually are able
to weigh different bits of information and form an opinion. Since the review
was about academic propriety, of course the people to judge that would be the
people who set and enforce those standards.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
