I think we need to separate the ads from the search. I agree with everyone (I 
think) that the search should be almost
'generic' - simply the best match for the search request, maybe sorted by the 
most recent or something like that, but
certainly not by who pays the most to google.

I have no problem at all with targeted ads. It would be a total waste to show 
me an ad for a restaurant in NY City
because it is unlikely that I will ever go there. However, I might buy from 
JR.com in NY City.

I have google ads on all my web sites so I can't complain about them.



At 06:52 AM 8/26/2011 -0700, Paul McNett wrote:
>On 8/26/11 6:17 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
...
> > I just read an article about it this past weekend within the NY Times.
...
> > seen by everyone here grumbling). What they are essentially doing is
> > attempting to PERSONALIZE the web experience for you. Based upon what
> > you are doing Over Time in doing searches in Google - the two different
...

>What they want to do is target advertising directly at the people most
>likely to
>click through on it.
>
>What I want is an objective highly-relevant search engine. IOW, what
>Google was in 1999.
>
>Paul

And note the "over time" concept. That means google is tracking your
activities. I don't want that. I don't want ads that "might" be interesting
to me. If I'm after a particular item, service, etc, I should be able to
describe it myself.

So, sure, Google is funding itself by telling advertisers information about
the people doing searches, and offering to do the in-your-face ads. And
Google is probably trying to pass that off as "benefiting the consumer".
Sorry, no buy-in from me.

Oh well. Can you imagine the amount of traffic this crap is throwing on the
internet?

-Charlie


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/061701cc641c$b6affaf0$7a00a8c0@w2k3s02
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to