It will be interesting to see how this progresses. I noticed in the link you 
sent that Facebook has 50TB and ebay has
2PB.

A long time ago there were some messages in this newsgroup about storing images 
in a field in the data table. The
consensus (I think) was that you should not do that. You should only store a 
pointer to a file on the disk with your
image or other very large file. The difference in this and NoSQL is that you 
can only find the file by whatever you used
in the data table to point to the file. NoSQL seems to be a way to search in 
the folder where you store the large files?
I would be interested to know how they do that. I don't see any specifics in 
those links.

Our company has had a EHR (electronic healthcare record) for years, but we 
recommend that the doctor store a simple note
like those in a paper chart. We definitely do not recommend trying to store 
scanned images (tiff or pdf, etc) or
pictures (jpg, etc). At this time we partnered with a company x-link.info to 
link our database to many 'certified' EHR
programs. To be 'certified' those EHR programs must store lab tests, x-rays, 
etc. For a small internal medicine group of
doctors (3-8 for example) that might be many terabytes for 7 years of data. How 
would you backup 7 TB data? If this new
healthcare bills survives the constitutional test, it might create a lot of 
work for companies that have 'server farms'

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Leafe" <[email protected]>
To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [NF] For those interested in Big Data


On Sep 22, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Dan Covill wrote:

> Wow!  That's the most new terms I had to look up since the MS press
> release for Win 8.

It took me several days of working with Cassandra until I could wrap my head 
around it. I have been working with data in
relational sets for so long that the notion of working with a non-relational 
database seemed like reading Chinese. But
I'm happy to say that I picked it up much faster than I would have become 
fluent in Chinese!

Non-relational data is not better or worse than relational - it's simply 
solving a different type of problem with a
different approach.


-- Ed Leafe




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/033701cc7951$b93e1ff0$7a00a8c0@w2k3s02
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to