On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Dave Crozier <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Microsoft has been heavily touting OLE DB as the successor > to ODBC. At PDC 98 they went as far as to state that there would no longer be > continuing to develop ODBC (they > would fix problems in their drivers, as needed, but not pursue future > versions of the API). They plan to invest all > new development into OLE DB." > > A bit of a seachange what? ---------------------- Back in 98 we were all looking to COM and today we DON'T. "Today using ADO.Net, or other MS database connectivity techniques shipping with Dot Net, the standard SQL Server connection is done using OLE DB, which utilizes the COM architecture. " The other statement in the article that ODBC was more open was somehow lost as well. ;-> -- Stephen Russell 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYLPCY4w5xBNTwyALzodxSXaM3y7ucfMW0htmKpyny=9...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
