Pete Theisen wrote: > Adam Buckland wrote: > >> Huge steaming pile of shit... >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust >> >> A moto > > Hi Adam, > > Remarkable that you and Leland have a similar mind on the issue. > > The event that provoked Congress' 396 to 9 response was that the Bammer > (or his myriad advisors) didn't know the status of the phrase and > arrogantly wouldn't take correction. If you had read the initial link, > or indeed even the part I quoted, you would know that. > > You also conflate "God" with "religion" which might not be valid, > particularly nowadays. I, for example, am fine with God. Religion > however, often gives me heartburn. > > My post had nothing to do with either the first or second amendments > which are fine as they are. The atheists, however, often demand that > they be free *from* religion as if they weren't already, and that is > what I had reference to with my "freedom from religion" remark. > > If you are an atheist, or ateist
Arghh! Atheist, already. Can see it in the post but not as flagged (as it is) in the edit window! I have an appointment with the eye doc, but not for a while yet. > sympathizer, surely you have heard > "freedom from religion" from someone long before I mentioned it. > >> has no effect on the 1st Amendment.... if you want the Govt to >> endorse a religion, change the constitution... and whilst you are at it >> get rid of guns by changing another but if you don't then shut up about >> it... there is no official religion... hence Islam is much an official >> religion of the US as Hinduism or Christianity.. >> >> Love and hugs from a smug bastard in Seattle....xxxx > > Smug bastard? I knew about the smug but, well, I had no idea . . . > >> Atheist and communist jihadis at work: >> >> http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/daily-dispatch/lawmaker-in-god-we-t >> rust-under-attack.html >> >> If we enjoy freedom *from* religion do we also enjoy freedom *from* >> atheism? Evidently not. Every now and then about 9 a55holes . . . >> >> "Last November, during a speech he delivered in Jakarta, the president >> stated that the national motto was "E pluribus unum. >> >> "Forbes said 42 members of Congress sent President Obama a letter asking >> him to correct the error. >> >> "Not only did the president refuse to respond to our letter, but still >> on the White House website they have up the incorrect national motto,"" >> >> And Bammer makes it an even 10! -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
