Hi Pete -- Jesus was the greatest liberal there has ever been!

#-------------------------------------------
Excerpt from you link Pete:
The House of Representatives passed a bi-partisan resolution Tuesday 
night reaffirming “In God We Trust” as the official motto of the United 
STates. The 396-9 vote came at the request of Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA) – 
in part over President Obama’s refusal to correct remarks he made that 
misstated the motto as “E pluribus unum” instead of “In God We Trust.”
#-------------------------------------------

Posted by bruce -- see link below
4.
bruce
nara, japan
October 30th, 2011 11:29 pm
AMERICAN mainstream christianity is the most unchristian christianity in 
the western world. it's code for racism, cheering for the overdog, 
revenge, narrow mindedness and ignorance. If i wasn't an atheist 
already, i'd become one rather than follow the revolting beliefs of the 
born again rabble in the u.s. Finally, why do Americans think it's 
important to show ostentatious displays of devoutness? Or is the part of 
the culture to not leave a thought unsaid? why is it somehow unseemly to 
keep your beliefs to yourself and practice them in the privacy of your 
own home...

#--------------------------------------------
Posted by Art V. -- see link below
10.
Art V.
Seattle
October 31st, 2011 1:04 am
As a Christian, one might begin by selecting a candidate that most 
closely follows Jesus Christ's Sermon on the Mount:

Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.

Blessed are the gentle, for they shall inherit the earth.

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they 
shall be satisfied.

Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.

Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

Here is one for Rick Perry!!!

When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to 
stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they 
may be seen by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full.
But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and 
pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is 
done in secret will reward you.

Here is one for all the liberal hating, Obama hating crowd.

For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your heavenly Father 
will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others, then your 
Father will not forgive your transgressions.

How about how Jesus viewed money?

Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust 
destroy, and where thieves break in and steal.
But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor 
rust destroys, and where thieves do not break in or steal; for where 
your treasure is, there your heart will be also.

No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love 
the other, or he will be devoted to one and despise the other. You 
cannot serve God and wealth.

Turns out, Mr. Cane was wrong! Jesus was not a conservative. Jesus was 
the greatest liberal there has ever been!

#-------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/10/30/the-role-of-religion-in-the-2012-election/the-christian-case-for-voting-against-obama

or

http://tinyurl.com/6x7xl8l

Regards,

LelandJ

On 11/03/2011 07:54 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> Adam Buckland wrote:
>
>> Huge steaming pile of shit...
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust
>>
>> A moto
> Hi Adam,
>
> Remarkable that you and Leland have a similar mind on the issue.
>
> The event that provoked Congress' 396 to 9 response was that the Bammer
> (or his myriad advisors) didn't know the status of the phrase and
> arrogantly wouldn't take correction. If you had read the initial link,
> or indeed even the part I quoted, you would know that.
>
> You also conflate "God" with "religion" which might not be valid,
> particularly nowadays. I, for example, am fine with God. Religion
> however, often gives me heartburn.
>
> My post had nothing to do with either the first or second amendments
> which are fine as they are. The atheists, however, often demand that
> they be free *from* religion as if they weren't already, and that is
> what I had reference to with my "freedom from religion" remark.
>
> If you are an atheist, or ateist sympathizer, surely you have heard
> "freedom from religion" from someone long before I mentioned it.
>
>> has no effect on the 1st Amendment.... if  you want the Govt to
>> endorse a religion, change the constitution... and whilst you are at it
>> get rid of guns by changing another but if you don't then shut up about
>> it... there is no official religion... hence Islam is much an official
>> religion of the US as Hinduism or Christianity..
>>
>> Love and hugs from a smug bastard in Seattle....xxxx
> Smug bastard? I knew about the smug but, well, I had no idea . . .
>
>> Atheist and communist jihadis at work:
>>
>> http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/daily-dispatch/lawmaker-in-god-we-t
>> rust-under-attack.html
>>
>> If we enjoy freedom *from* religion do we also enjoy freedom *from*
>> atheism? Evidently not. Every now and then about 9 a55holes . . .
>>
>> "Last November, during a speech he delivered in Jakarta, the president
>> stated that the national motto was "E pluribus unum.
>>
>> "Forbes said 42 members of Congress sent President Obama a letter asking
>> him to correct the error.
>>
>> "Not only did the president refuse to respond to our letter, but still
>> on the White House website they have up the incorrect national motto,""
>>
>> And Bammer makes it an even 10!


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to