I believe that the rebellions in Egypt and Libya wouldn't have been successful without the dissemination of the news. (For better or worse.)
I imagine that this technology would be important anywhere that governments are oppressing on-line information. On 11/16/2011 12:33 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > I don't feel ambivalent about it at all. I can see no honest and > upright use for machinery designed to send messages to people without > letting them find out who you are. Anonymous is the coward's way. > > At best, it's a tool for paranoids. At worst (and most likely) it's an > enabling device for spam factories. > > Dan Covill -- Kevin Cully CULLY Technologies, LLC 678-929-7762 [email protected] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
