Agreed - that we do - and thanks 4 the compliment. Although -I hate to say it - your reply was actually a REPLY to my Posting - as you posted you actual reply right above what I wrote! Which makes it even more humorous...
:-) -K- On 1/29/2012 8:00 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > Kurt:\ > > Didn't see yours until after I sent mine. I agree, same idea. Great > minds run in the same channels.<g> > > Dan > > On 01/29/12 11:26, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote: >> Hey - wait - Dan - isn't that what I just said in my "Alternately" >> labeled statement of my reply? [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
