Sounds like you may be describing Obama. ----- Original Message ----- From: "lelandj" <[email protected]> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 1:02 PM Subject: Re: [OT] The Ginger exonerated, but who knew?
Whether Newt Gingrich is guilty of some criminal or ethical law is not the real issue. The real problem is Newt Gringrich himself. Speacker Gingrich is a egotist that gets off on power. He seem to feel he can abuse power with impunity, and will spin criticism to place blame on others. Speaker Gingrich seems to have a superiority complex with feelings that he alone is capable of governing and making good policy. It's either his way or the highway. Based on Speaker Gingrich's selfish, egotistical, manipulative traits, Speaker Gingrich would make a terrible president in my opinion, just like he was a terrible Speaker of the House. Regards, LelandJ On 01/28/2012 09:25 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote: > What do you expect from these liberal newspapers and Dan Rather? Reporting > in national media lies without actually reading the transcripts. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pete Theisen"<[email protected]> > To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:27 PM > Subject: [OT] The Ginger exonerated, but who knew? > > > Hi Everybody, > > http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ethics-charges-gingrich-was-exonerated_618658.html > > “In return for those admissions, the House reprimanded Gingrich and > levied an unprecedented $300,000 fine. > > “…[T]he IRS [then] began an investigation that would stretch over three > years….IRS investigators obtained tapes and transcripts of each session > during the two years the course was taught…. > > “[In 1999, the] IRS concluded the course simply was not political….[T]he > IRS wrote, ‘…the content of the “Renewing American Civilization” course > was educational...and not biased toward any of those who were supposed > to be benefited.’ > > “The bottom line: Gingrich acted properly and violated no laws…. > > “Back in January 1997…the Washington Post’s front-page banner headline > was ‘Gingrich Actions “Intentional” or “Reckless”; Counsel Concludes > That Speaker’s Course Funding Was “Clear Violation” of Tax Laws.’ That > same day, the New York Times ran eleven stories on the Gingrich matter, > four of them on the front page (one inside story was headlined, ‘Report > Describes How Gingrich Used Taxpayers’ Money for Partisan Politics’). On > television, Dan Rather began the CBS Evening News by telling viewers > that ‘only now is the evidence of Newt Gingrich’s ethics violations and > tax problems being disclosed in detail.’ > > “The story was much different when Gingrich was exonerated. The > Washington Post ran a brief story on page five. The Times ran an equally > brief story on page 23. And the evening newscasts of CBS, NBC, and ABC — > which together had devoted hours of coverage to the question of > Gingrich’s ethics — did not report the story at all….” [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/40E40832630C40A6A043BC5957838865@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
