On 01/30/2012 12:44 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> lelandj wrote:
>
>> I think Rick Santorum would be much more overbearing in pushing his
>> extremely conservative social and religious views on society, than just
>> about any other Republican or Democratic president with the possible
>> exception of George W. Bush, the son.
> Not as "bad" as Bush II? This is your idea of faint praise, I guess?
>
>> The president of the USA is elected to represent all the people
> Then how come the bammer is only representing himself and Chicago thugs?
>
>>> Hold the phone, now. The constitution says the government cannot
>>> establish a "state religion", not that they have to have nothing to do
>>> with religion.
>> if the doctrine of "separation between church and state" were eliminated
> "Doctrine" my a55. Mere D party talking point, not any kind of law.
> Freedom of religion is alive and well even if government programs can in
> some cases be faith based, or the government can prohibit religious
> killings.
>
>>> There have been 60 million abortions - killed babies. How many more do
>>> you want killed, Mein Führer?
>> None, but that decision is not up to me, nor should it be up to the
>> federal government with laws that make abortion a crime.  I'm very much
>> a pro-life kind of guy, but I also know that anything that removes the
>> abortion decision from the potential parents will fail.
> Nope, the time is right to recognize the humanity of all babies. $50
> (first offense) fine to the mother who aborts, loss of license and 20
> years prison to the "doctor", unless there is a permit.
>
> A permitting process should be established where an abortion to SAVE THE
> LIFE of the mother would be permitted, but not just so she can fit into
> her size 2 prom dress in time for a date. Now, applying for an abortion
> permit automatically authorizes an adoption so the girl does not have to
> be a mother beyond the birth event if she doesn't want to.
>
>> Fear of homosexuality is irrational.
> Nope. Not to fear homosexuality is irrational. The very destruction of
> all civilization is before us and the Ds think it is like deciding which
> shoes to wear with which pants.
>
>> Rich Santorum favors enforcing current immigration law; rather than
>> reforming it.  He would be heartless in his enforcement of the law no
>> matter how harsh, unfair or painful the consequence on Hispanic men,
>> women and children.
> Mexico is responsible for her own people. They have to go back to their
> own government rather than try to bleed our people dry. If their
> government is evil, they must reform it.
>
>>> Oh, "right to die", indeed! Terri simply had no idea about that, but it
>>> was wrong to kill her just to get her money. What if you have someone
>>> standing on a ledge saying he wants to jump? Do you try to talk him out
>>> of it?
>> It was never ever really about what was best or right for Terri.
> How the hell do you know? Are you some sort of divinity to know a man's
> heart if he is an R? It couldn't have been about the ex-husband having
> to give up all the money for a while? Oh, and you ducked the question
> about the man on the ledge, didn't you?

I'm not the only one that believes Terri Schiavo was used buy a faction 
of the Republican party for political gains.

#----------------------------------
Excerpt:

But I call your attention to this little item contained therein:

In 2005, Santorum made headlines — not all positive — for visiting the 
deathbed of Terri Schiavo, the woman at the center of a national 
right-to-die controversy. What my Philadelphia Daily News colleague John 
Baer later exposed was that the real reason he was in the Tampa, Fla., 
area was to collect money at a $250,000 fundraiser organized by 
executives of Outback Steakhouses, a company that shared Santorum's 
passion for a low minimum wage for waitresses and other rank-and-file 
workers. Santorum’s efforts were also aided by his unusual mode of 
travel: Wal-Mart's corporate jet. And he canceled a public meeting on 
Social Security reform "out of respect for the Schiavo family" even as 
the closed fundraisers went on.

What I care about is that he exploited family's personal tragedy for his 
own political gain. What I care about is that this good Catholic boy 
committed what the Jesuits of my youth would have called an unforgivable 
mortal sin against charity. What I care about is that he contributed to 
a disgusting public spectacle that made life difficult for some 
wonderful people doing great, impossible work, people whose boots he is 
not worthy to lick. God, I hope there is an accounting one day.

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/rick-santorum-terri-schiavo-6633360

#----------------------------------

Regards,

LelandJ

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to