> 
> I checked for deadbeats and shut them off as opposed to checking for
> good customers.  So if I dried up and blew away, I'd never update the
> deadbeat list and hence the customer would keep using the software
> without issue.  Try and devise your "kill switches" that way for best
> results, imo.
> Mike Babcock, MCP


That's a good point... Should prolly assume customer is in a 'good'
status, and only have your system deal with 'bad' status customers...

I wrote something once to deal w/ a problematic client but chickened out
when it came time to implement it.... wish I had - I'd be $4k richer
right now....

Thanks,
 
Matthew Jarvis || Business Systems Analyst
IT Department
McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center
1460 G Street, Springfield, OR  97477 || Ph: 541-744-6092 || Fax:
541-744-6145
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain information that is
Proprietary, Confidential, or legally privileged or protected. It
is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity named
in the message. If you are not an intended recipient of this
message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
material from your computer. Do not deliver, distribute or copy
this message and do not disclose its contents or take any action in
reliance on the information it contains.

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/69f310c05dd83c48a84ba3769ce1ecf806311...@tntriexevs02.triadhospitals.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to