On 1/30/2012 3:06 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > On 01/30/2012 12:42 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:09 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What were you afraid of? That they'd sue? In my case, I had an air >>> tight case (or so I thought). My gamble paid off. It was a well >>> calculated plan of attack. One of my proudest accomplishments that >>> wasn't a really slick app/screen design. >> ------------------- >> >> You can be run over by legal bills necessary on the front end by your >> lawyer. Suddenly 4K isn't much vs 200/hr and a lot of documentation >> or "discovery time" that gets billed. >> > I mentioned that I am only going to do this for month to month or > customers making payments. They are agreeing to this checking in the > agreement. >
I met a guy who only allowed clients who agreed to a monthly EFT and if that failed, he had an easy shutoff. That's the best solution/approach, imo. Check out the monthly EFT report and disable those who's EFT failed or didn't appear on the report. No chasing debts with his approach. NICE. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
